Comments for "Shadow Inventory?"


OT: Getting back to our tea bagging argument yesterday... This seems like a more effective means of protest:

http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE53700V20090408

Huzzah for the OC.


Don't start with the tea-bagging again, you'll just get Liz worked up.


I'm pretty much convinced that if a bank thinks hiding something is to the bank's benefit, they will hide it.

And honestly, how many of those properties are in shape to be sold, right now? In other words, hiding it for now is free, while selling it would cost money.

Short term vs. long term - and which choice is the American way?


I've looked hard for a large amount of shadow inventory, I just don't see it in my neck of the woods.

http://effectivedemand.blogspot.com


Teabagging? Is that another one of those euphemisms like 'cottaging'?


Jim the Realtor revisits this issue regularly. There is indeed far more in the pipeline than shows up on the MLS.

--It won't be pretty but it will be an Exurban Nation--


I'm with Mr. Mortgage on this one. There's a ton of crap inventory that the banks refuse to put on the market.


Actually, let me go one step further.

For Ventura County and the San Fernando Valley... not only is there not a large amount of shadow inventory sitting on the sidelines the market is currently running out of REOs because of all the foreclosure moratoriums and the banks having difficulties getting their hands on the inventory.

You can check out the weekly interactive inventory graphs here:

http://effectivedemand.blogspot.com/2009/04/weekly-activepending-counts-...

Distressed inventory (REOs and Short Sales) is getting smaller, not larger. Plus the market on the low end is very strong right now.

http://effectivedemand.blogspot.com


Around the DFW TX area, the REO goes on the market, crap or not. The crap can't get a FHA loan for sure, much of it can't get a loan at all. So it goes on the market, gets pulled off a few times to have the deal fall through, then to get re listed with lower and lower prices until a cash buyer steps up.

At least around here a smart buyer can get realistic cash flow, if they are good at estimating repair costs and realistic rents. I know people renting in CA for a price that is basically covering the HOA and taxes.

The banks need to get smart and list the crap so it sells to the cash buyer without all the run around and work, and concentrate on selling the better assets at a fair price.


Maybe 600K is high, but from ground level in the NoVa area, I would say there is a grain of truth in the statement.
We've recently *thought* about moving into a better neighborhood and started researching. I've been walking selected neighborhoods and started noticing how many SFH's are empty (there are signs on the windows/doors that the home was "Winterized"), but there is no MLS listing or real estate sign in front. I don't have a "list", but off hand, I've probably come across 5 homes that fit this description.

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.


Roubini - "Cramer is a buffoon".

I disagree. Cramer is a sociopath. Kudlow is a myopic buffoon.


Rob,

I think it depends on how you define shadow inventory. If you define it as inventory the banks have taken back but not on the market.. the number is small.

If you define it as inventory which has a NOD or NTS filed but not on the market. The number is large.

But in my book, until the banks can get their hands on the house to resell it isn't inventory. Especially considering this political climate in which massive pressure is being brought upon servicers to reduce any and all foreclosures.

http://effectivedemand.blogspot.com


In my area I know of several self-appointed "real estate magnates" that have properties they'd desperately like to unload, but can't because their asking prices are totally out of line with the current market. So, they've de-listed them and are licking their wounds, too embarrassed to admit publicly (yet) how little their prior success was luck of timing than industry knowledge.

These aren't bank-owned properties yet, but they very well may end up being owned by a bank...


Sociopath? But he has that soundboard! Don't soundboards and wacky morning-drive style hijinks count for anything anymore?



Why sell now when the proposal hasn't been hashed out yet for the "Misplaced species removal" amendment.

In the aforementioned (part of an $80 Trillion sweeping wildlife protection bill), a few hundred billion will be allocated to refurbish and tidy-up the growing wild life preserves, er, houses, that the banks are currently sitting on.

In OT news, I think my next handle is gonna be..."you don't understand finance".Smile


UH HOLD ON!

Max, me and others said this a year ago and you ignored us CR!! Now the Chronicle does a story and you post it!

______________________________________________________

Crispy & Cole...suddenly I feel optomistic!


There might just be a built in a lag between when the banks foreclose to when the properties are finally sold.

There might even be a name for said lag, like "redemption period". Some states haz them:

http://www.realtytrac.com/foreclosure-laws/foreclosure-laws-comparison.asp


For Phoenix - I would agree that the larger proportion of shadow inventory consists of houses that have been abandoned, but the bank has not stepped up to take responsibility for the property.


"Instead of using aggregate statistics, it would probably be better to do a survey - follow some number of foreclosures and see what happens to them each month."

Or you could follow a random of homes (which I have done) and see what happens. Here is the summar - they sit without a listing on the MLS, the weeds grow and they dont show up on the statistics for months

______________________________________________________

Crispy & Cole...suddenly I feel optomistic!


I think there is a large shadow inventory. Banks don't want to realize so many losses at a time. There's this condo around the corner from us that's been empty for over a year. Never any for sale signs. Only a sticker on the door from countrywide that says to call for info on the property. Then you try to call and there's no answers.


Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. - George Washington


I believe the report has merit. I suspect that the unaccounted properties have been posted as collateral for the federal reserve loan facilities. Perhaps this is one one off the reasons why the Fed refuses to divulge info on the collateral posted.


For example, lets put the 100,000 number quoted in the article as Shadow Inventory for California in context.

Predicted about 470,000 home sold in CA this year. Currently REOs are about 58% of resales according to DQ. So that makes it about 4.4 months worth of REO inventory considering its absorption rate in the market. That is basically the float for servicers to get homes prepped and up on market. Some are very quick and get it up right away if there is no owner to evict or they can do cash for keys.. others it takes longer. So that number is about right and not especially large and you see the same thing in the national numbers.

http://effectivedemand.blogspot.com


Betcha many bankers are getting great deals on some of these properties.


Wow, Gary, that's an interesting possibility that you've raised there.

It would be another instance where the financial agencies are clearly working against the interests and stated aims of other agencies.


this is real_folks: what area of NoVA were you looking at?


I posted this on the last thread but i just realized there is a new one.

while we're on the deflation vs inflation thing. I was thinking about this the other day. I think most agree they are printing money, Jas doesnt, and I'm not smart enough to figure out who is right. Anyway say they are printing and still the consumers are feeling deflation. I would blame the consumers deflation on money velocity and that would mean that all of the excess supply has been absorbed by the fat kats perhaps? Is this all just more looting of the american citizen? TIA !

Sushi


how about those Hedge funds that are buying large number of properties at below

wholesale prices. Perhaps they are just sitting on them for later release?


The banks, a fountain of idiocy, will keep the houses off the market, until they are completely stripped, vandalized, burned down, and finally used as toxic chemical dumping grounds - finally literally turning their assets into truly "toxic' assets.
You can always buy and hold something until it is more than worthless (I imagine cities will initiate a number of malign ownership lawsuites against the banks). Hmmm... than we can have a true test of Federalism - don't sue the banks, we're trying to save them!!!


Told you guys a couple of days ago...

Banks are not selling REOs. And with the new mark to fantasy rules, as long as they still hold the asset, unsold, they can mark their securities to whatever and still be "solvant".

This is the same thing that happened to Japanese Banks. A lot of them owned homes in secret during the downturn.

20 year of stagnant, here we come. The only way home prices come down now is from inflation; which would be *VERY SLOW*.

This is why I was depressed, this scenario means even renters are out on a limb, because you cannot rent economically for 20 years; at some point you'll have to buy something, and sail the descent with everyone other homeowners.


could be repost..Fisher says economy is grim...

http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE5370N220090408

as for personal experience with shadow inventory...sister has been in home in foreclosure for last 15 months..NOD was filed 12 months ago....

I see it everywhere..That figure seems low to me....

I emptied my bank account so the bastards can't use it. Being in debt is like diving with great white sharks.


As has been mentioned by others before, there will eventually (not now) be a lot of work for contractors repairing/rebuilding all these empty, deteriorating houses.


Anon:"Banks don't want to realize so many losses at a time. "

Some merit to this. One of the major reasons loan modifications focus on interest rates reduction over principal reduction is that if you reduce interest rates you don't have to recognize the loss. Apparently there is no accounting rule on getting grossly underpaid on your capital on the amount of risk you are taking.

http://effectivedemand.blogspot.com


Here's an example of a home in a nice town near where I live that should be going for about $150k more than it's listed at, and there's another one nearby in the same situation. Looks like some builder is taking a real haircut Wink


Hey, this feels like the good old bull market days. Shnaps, crispy, and other old timers with few commentators in general.

Except all the people i respect are still bearish, Hussman, roubini, rosenberg, Fleck.


In the mean time, neighbourhoods go to shit.


I miss Tanta; would have loved to hear her insight on this.

I think regional banks, community banks, and large Money-centered banks all have VERY different motivations...incentives and disincentives ... for 'managing/massaging' the volume of assets they list or dont list.

I doubt there is a one-size fits-all set of data and explanation for any of this.
Usually in CR-Land, we dont fall for 1-size-fits-all data or explanations.


holding on to shadow inventory

now what would make anybody believe the banks would do a thing like that

its not like they have these mark to fantasy securities that make them insolvent

but they think if they just hold back until the "market " for toxic waste returns then the shit will fetch a higher price

criminal do usually return to the scene of the crime

mt


there's a regulation that specifies very generally (non-quantitative terms) how long a bank can hold on to REOs. During the run-up to GLBA, there was actually a brouhaha between the American Bankers Assn and the NAR on whether banks could get into the real estate business. Surprisingly, Congress sided with the NAR.

Of course, adhering to regulations is sooooo yesterday.

OT: another retailer (Jos A Banks +17%) beat estimates. Haven't delved into the details, but this may be a recurring theme, *at least for this quarter* b/c there's only so many expenses that you can cut to make up for declining revenues.


The old place I rented has not seen a payment since Oct 07. The HOA has now filed a notice of default but not a word from Citibank who owns the note. I wonder if HOA will force the banks to take action?


I don't know that it's any one particular thing, but rather a combination.

1. Some deliberate withholding from market to avoid driving price down further.
2. Sheer ops backlog as they can't keep up with things that are unravelling.
3. Gary the Actuary's comment might have merit - that some of these properties are parts of bundles that have been pledged to the Fed as part of TARP/window facilities.

homedad43



I haven't quantified it but one part of the market which is increasing is Vacant short sales. I think this is the banks way of not registering the home as a REO. The owner has gave up but the servicer asks them to list it and they will get the sale approved. On a political front, a short sale is much better than a REO for the servicers.

http://effectivedemand.blogspot.com


"OT: another retailer (Jos A Banks +17%) beat estimates. Haven't delved into the details, but this may be a recurring theme, *at least for this quarter* b/c there's only so many expenses that you can cut to make up for declining revenues."

Jos A Banks sells suits and ties that people wear on interviews but never again once they have a job.


DMB is giving monkey's a bad name....accountability, nah

booooooyaaaaahahahhahahahhah


Cinco-X

Checked out the Zillow for that house.

Sweet Jesus, not a bad place, esp with 2+ acres near state land/park.

homedad43


Three acres of snow.


The recent NY Times magazine article on Cleveland demonstrated pretty clearly that there, at least, banks are sitting on inventory, selling houses to wholesalers who then sit on them, and even canceling foreclosures at the last minute so they don't have to be responsible for the cost of upkeep or teardown. I'd guess the dynamics of this depend a lot on the local market. In SF Bay area you can still sell most of your repos for a few hundred K, so it'd make more sense to take possession and sell, so I'd think the bank-owned shadow inventory would be lower. Where you can only sell it for a few hundred bucks, it's not worth it.

One way or another, their analysis of the DataQuick data does seem flawed.


" at some point you'll have to buy something"
-----

Care to make a bet on that?


Jos A Banks sells suits and ties that people wear on interviews but never again once they have a job.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Actually, they're going to run into problems with Goodwill down the road.

Used to have 6 nice suits for work and now down to 2; haven't purchased new one in 9 years. All went to Goodwill and when I'm in there, there's usually several there.

homedad43


Go long Goodwill ...

... and foodbanks.


I don't see how any perceived benefits could outweigh the negatives from the banks' perspective here. First of all, banks are already estimating that housing prices will continue to drop. If this is the case, why not take advantage of current market prices rather than sell later at a greater loss? Also, aren't the banks forced to pay HOA fees and taxes?


'Jos A Banks sells suits and ties that people wear on interviews but never again once they have a job.'

Not around DC - but then, a shadow inventory of suits has always been a DC trademark.


I somewhat of a believer in CR's lag time theory- even in a perfect world, it takes a couple of months to go from listed to sold, so there is an automatic lag built in. Much more lag time if some clean-up and/or evictions are needed. And what incentive do banks have to keep REOs off market, especially when they know more are coming.
However, my anecdotal info is telling me more- I have been tracking two nearby houses that went back to the banks in Nov. and both are still bank owned and unlisted. I can understand one or two months, but six? Are than banks that incompetent, or do they have something else in mind?


Cinco-X- Huh? Why should that property be $150,000 more then the list price?

List price $269,000

If you scroll down on Zillow it gives you the most valuable information. Last sale price, assessed price for tax purposes, last taxes paid.

2009 tax assessor's value: $232,400
Sold 04/04/2006:
$248,000 *
2009 Property Tax:
$3,328


'Care to make a bet on that?'

Sure Broward - transportation comes to mind. So does food.

Still wanna bet?


Off subject

600K 2008 Coach sells for 350K bank and dealer partnered haircut, for inventory. I'm sure yachts under simular pressure...Reality will be when there's nothing new to sell at these dealships. Direct build to order with traveling service support. Dell was just ahead of the curve...


Bank Of America needs another bailout?

Wow, that's the fastest drop in profitability in history - 3 weeks.

http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/banking/2009-03-12-bank-of-amer...


"Go long Goodwill ... ... and foodbanks."

Go long on friends.


"Still wanna bet?"
----

Oh, yes, absolutely.

I bet I can hang out longer at my parents house than you imagine. Smile


"The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission told a federal judge that Bernard Madoff need not be forced into personal bankruptcy to ensure that all his assets are used to pay those he stole from.

The agency today opposed a request by victims of Madoff's Ponzi scheme to push him into bankruptcy. The SEC said Madoff's assets, once recovered by the regulator and the Department of Justice, will be distributed to Madoff's victims and creditors. The victims fear that the assets wouldn't be turned over to them, the agency said. "

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aH6vprlzvR0s&refer=us

Why does this fail the smell test?


There are 25 million more homes than families in America. This is according to Meredith Whitney. Hard to believe CR is calling a bottom on RE this year when this is the case. As we continue down the path of more government intervention, all will not seem as it is. Does anyone seriously believe all the inventory is for sale ? If i were a builder or bank, as long as somoene else is paying, I would hold the properties and let the government bail me out until the end the asset value catches up to the marked-to-fantasy CDO/CDS value.


Suit won't matter when the job ends up being you and a shovel. Many fluff jobs will be gone.


+1 Funny re: shadow inventories of suits

How long until we see UAVs scouting out pirate bases as cruise missile targets?

http://www.voanews.com/english/2009-04-08-voa18.cfm


In cases where there are HOA dues or condo association fees the lender may file a Notice of Default but then hold off on filing the Notice of Trustee Sale to avoid being assessed the dues or fees for the unit before they're ready to sell. (Tenants in these situations can sometimes stay for months or years without having to pay rent, as the landlord has abandoned the property but the bank hasn't taken it over. In some cases it's politic for the tenants to agree to pay the dues or fees, as the development management will be happy to get at least something on the property.)


Let us all recall that the actual price of a home is less relevant to the health of the economy than price change. If inventory is being well managed by the banks to slow or stop the drop in home prices, this still doesn't prevent the main pain caused by the housing market. In fact, it actually makes it worse. Think about it. Is DOW 8000 good or bad? Well, it's currently a reason to celebrate...not because it's a good number in and of itself, but because we got to it by going through DOW 6500 first. Now take a glance at the DSHORT graph of the 4 major bear markets. You'll notice the one that dropped the least was the Nikkei. However, that is the one that did the most damage to the most people, and the one that lasted the longest. Why? Because there was never a time when buyers prospered. A slow decent damages all the faithful. A sharp drop means a bounce to boost the spirits of the faithful buyers.

For housing it's even worse, because consumers need price rises to be able to extract equity or contribute to the psychological wealth effect to encourage spending and dampen the need to save aggressively for retirement. Banks need prices rises to reduce the cost of default thereby reducing the risk and increasing the profit. The housing boom wasn't that house prices were expensive, it was that they rose/changed so quickly that people's worth and spending power rose faster than inflation.

Whatever the banks do to make sure that housing never again rises rapidly, or worse, continues to drop ever so slowly for years on end, they will find that it is counterproductive.

The best thing to excite the spirits of buyers is to get them feeling like not only is the bottom in, but the new bull market is starting without them.


I know I posted this before.

I looked at a new rental not far from the one I just signed the lease on. This was in a Meritage development. The home (3600 sqft 5/3 3car garage with every granitepregostainless doodad under the sun) sold in 04 for 640k. They defaulted in 2yr 9 mos. like clockwork. Home sat empty with no MLS listing or tenant for 7 mos. It finally "sold" to a specuinvestard LLC for 286k as part of a bulk purchase. They listed it on their inhouse service for about 5 months for 350k. The difference in the 286k vs 350k being their flipping premium. It sold to an investor in Colorado for 270k. Closed in Feb 09 and was up for rent a week later. The reason I know this is I was looking at leasing it myself and stopped by one day and was lucky to get to have a long conversation with the new owner. She was asking $1875. mo and then lowered to 1750 which is what she offered me if I'd take it starting the first.

The Mello Roos is pretty expensive so the effective property tax rate is high, there are clubhouse dues, and the HOA is another 130 mo. Unless she threw a huge amount of cash at the purchase, there is no way she is anywhere near covering the monthly payment on the place. She said she plans to hold it for a long time but does she really plan on loosing 1k a month for the next 10 years? Is that some sort of new investment strategy?

In the meantime, houses all around it are in a similar state. Some have been purchased to be rentals already and many more on their way to the rental market and they will all be competing for the same small pool of tenants. This is in a suburb of Sacramento.


Why would I get upset about tea bagging? But maybe I don't understand what it is--thought is was thowing teabags instead of loose tea in the water in imitation of Boston Tea Party.

Very busy, no time.

I'm convinced about the shadow inventory here. Lots of REOs to look at. Not so many worth living in.

And, if I remember right, the "Indians" threw tea overboard that was owned by somebody else to prevent their fellow Bostonians from buying it?

lawyerliz


Cinco

Its not a house. Just a lot with no septic done yet.

But it has been stumped!

http://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-detail/698-Townsend-Rd_Groton_...

I despise Relitters



So i am going to be in San Diego...May 5th-8th on business.

My question to the natives is what shouldn't I miss?

And doesn't tell me the shadow inventory or Jim the Realtor.


Do you clean the house and cook in lieu of rent, B. Horne?

You would at my house.

lawyerliz


I think some people are confusing "tea parties" with "tea bagging"...err, they are not the same thing...


The "Boston tea party" was one of a series of tea-tossing protests along the eastern seaboard. Collectively they were protesting rising import duties on goods shipped into the colonies from Europe. Tea was a convenient target because there was already a domestic tea-production industry. It was more about protectionism than anything, IMHO.

I think the first "tea party" was actually in Virginia or Carolina. It wasn't a new idea when it happened here.


"1/3 of Phoenix valley homes sit empty"

http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/1031vacant-homes1...

The way I heard it (hearsay alert: if anyone has a verification I'd LOVE to read it) the method works like this: Juan applies for a no income check mortgage for a $100k house, gets approved and then sells it to uncle Pedro for $150k on another no income check mortgage, uncle Pedro sells the house to brother Jaime for $200k. They then go back home to Mexico and split the proceeds $33k apeice.

The more complicated way, and more likely scenario is all of them buy a $100k house, then they sell to other family for $150k then they all buy again for $200k, then they all go home to Mexico.

Let's walk through it from first person perspective, just to see the details of how it works:

I, Jorge, applied for a no check mortgage loan on a $100k loan, I declared that my income was $60k and no one checks, so, I'm approved. I sell the house to a friend who is also doing the game for $150k - and I get $50k cash from the sale, which I split with the friend who bought. I apply for another no check mortgage to buy a $200k house from another friend, I'm approved. I again split the difference in price where he bought for $150k, so I pocket another $25k then I return home to Guadalajara.

Eventually the house is foreclosed on and the bank sits on it hoping that the federal government will ride to the rescue and buy the house from them for $200k.


At least, that's how the history books here tell it. Maybe the ones that Texas authorized actually report that we came up with the idea independently. *shrug*


CR, be convinced. I've done enough valuation work to tell you that in just about every market I work (Socal) the disparity is wide, very wide. Numerous properties that should be on market and are definitely not. Take a drive through Palmdale one of these days, it's more obvious there.

-- Das Boot


In speaking to other Real Estate Brokers I have found that NO ONE has good numbers about the size of the "Shadow Inventory".The few i respect say things like "it is BIG" or "Tremendous" but no one has a number they are willing to quote.These are people who have been in the Business 10-20 years and know the local market.This lack of transparency is frustrating and needs to change ASAP,those who profit by the obfuscation are few but powerful.Consumers and honest brokers want price discovery,it is the only way we can have a healthy market.How can I or any one else honestly advise some one to buy in a market like this?

Tom Stone


"You would at my house"
-------

That's your problem, not mine. Smile


I am a contractor in Massachusetts. As new business dried up last fall I looked into the REO maintenance trade. I visited ten REO homes in our suburban area. None of these REOs had sale signs. Four months later they still don't and are still unoccupied. This winter REOs were easy to spot, driveways unplowed, walks unshoveled, rooftops deep with snow because of no heat coming from inside the house. This is Mass which is doing well compared to you guys in SoCal. My impression is that there is a huge shadow inventory, I have been saying this to my friends for months. The REO maintenance trade is a terrible business by the way. Obviously banks aren't about to throw (more) money away on these properties.


A condo in my kids building has been in foreclosure for about a year now. They are still living there and have paid no HOA fees either. I bet there is a lot of inventory just like this out there.


Reologist, sure - there are many REOs not on the market. but I'm not convinced it is 600 thousand. Maybe.

best wishes.

Calculated Risk


So the consumer has gone from the Heloc's to CC's . What's next? 401k cash-outs?


500K homes in Phoenix, 1/3 sit empty... that's just one market, better put on your grounded tin foil hat CR and start believing.

http://realestate.aol.com/Phoenix-AZ-real-estate


"So the consumer has gone from the Heloc's to CC's . What's next? 401k cash-outs?"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes.


It's as if the banks are trying to make a 3/2 SFH look like a rabbit ears shadow, sleight of hand-no demand.


Current home purchases are future inventory. Too many are sold to optimistic investors who see poor returns elsewhere and are barely able to cashflow. Many are actually losing money each month. They do so because they fear inflation and believe they'll make money on the captial appreciation. They underestimate the deflationary pressures and aren't accounting for job loss pressure, rent pressure, and the fact that rates are at the bottom so if inflation ever does come, so comes increased home loan rates....higher rates mean prices stay flat as buying power is reduced. We are set up for flat prices, or prices rising below inflation for a very long time. Current investors will throw in the towel slowly over the years keeping constant inventory pressure on the market.


The superior feeling I cultivated in being honest, trustworthy and smart enough to recognize the RE bubble has evaporated. I now consider myself an idiot for not getting in on the money making by fraud machine the last few years. I'm sitting here trying to figure out how to make some ill gotten gains from the stimulus or REOs.

Moral hazard? Nah just the dawning realization that the honest man is a fool in this country. Heaven is the reward for living a righteous life. Right? RIGHT?


500K homes in Phoenix, 1/3 sit empty... that's just one market, better put on your grounded tin foil hat CR and start believing.

good thread music-especially last comment...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ip1zsUIosoA

I emptied my bank account so the bastards can't use it. Being in debt is like diving with great white sharks.


Heaven is the concept that exists as a shadow of Hell. Hell is the concept that exists to prevent people from taking revenge on their enemies in their lifetime. Neither is real in any meaningful way. If we wanted it, we could make a life for ourselves that would be equal to or better than common conceptions of heaven.


Hey CR, It's springtime....We need some early hiking Pics!!! no more D&G. Spring wildflowers' , flush mtn creeks, Forest panorama's....!


Phoenix, AZ Real Estate Market
a neighborhood with 545,594 households , house depreciates 11.7% in the last 12 months, there are 22362 homes for sale, including 22356 foreclosures .

The 1/3 homes sitting empty are homes currently for sale. This is not 1/3 of the 545,594 households in Phoenix. I am having trouble figuring out the homes for sale to foreclosures ratio. Something a little off there.

Data cut and pasted from FSHB link.


Journey for thread music, man, you are even older than me lol.


The only problem with cutting off the banks from their oxygen, i.e. your deposits:

Flatliners don't need to breathe anymore...

The Night of the Living Debt


I can speak a bit for the SF proper and Marin & Sonoma counties:

1) Many vacant short sales in 'middle class' areas -- and there are more the further north that you go, with foreclosures mostly in low income areas/SFH and condos... now. Last year we (myself and my appraiser cousin) noticed that quite a few 'short sales' ended up in foreclosure.

Note that we are also seeing lots of 'middle class' and 'upper middle class' properties go for sale first 'off' the MLS, as folks hope they can slow the 'days for sale' clock a bit.

I'd also note that most folks in those areas seem to still be pricing too high; now we are also seeing 'for lease' signs at some SFHs that have been for sale for over 9 months -- in great condition and in very nice locations.

2) The banks are sloooooow as molasses getting properties on the market and doing deals. I guess the few actual do-the-work staff left are swamped, and due to all of the banks-eating-other banks, aren't exactly working at a high rate of efficiency. I know one REO staffer who didn't have a phone or email for two weeks...


Of Valley homes for sale, a third sit empty
20,000 vacant homes pushing prices lower

Catherine Reagor
The Arizona Republic
Oct. 31, 2007 12:00 AM
Vacant homes are a big reason why Valley home prices are falling.

At least one out of every three homes FOR SALE across metropolitan Phoenix is empty, and owners are motivated to cut prices to sell.

http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/1031vacant-homes1...


If the numbers don't match, something stinks. There are lies, damned lies, and then there are statistics. (Apologies to Mark Samuel Clemens Twain for mangling his quote)


"So the consumer has gone from the Heloc's to CC's . What's next? 401k cash-outs?

Yes. And IRAs. And annuities (insurance company settlements, etc.). Reverse mortgages, if they own their homes outright but are cash-poor (mostly the elderly).

The entire kitchen junk-drawer of financial assets will be emptied. Hell, by the time it's over kids may be enlisting in the military to get the sign-up bonus for their families, if those are still offered.


"just the dawning realization that the honest man is a fool in this country"
-------

Yes, exacctly.
I did the college thing.
Then I did it again.
i've been jacked around by scam companies for the past five years.
And now I'm getting jacked around again with 20% paycut offers and now I'm facing age discrimination.

It's all a big crock of shit.

The TARP thing will increase the politicization of private industry jobs to an even worse degree, which means no honest person can expect to get anywhere now.

It's time for crime.


I see where I misread, apologies. It would be interesting to do just what CR proposes: track 100 foreclosures from the past year.


"Hell, by the time it's over kids may be enlisting in the military to get the sign-up bonus for their families, if those are still offered. "

Whats that going to do to the mercenary industry?

Any way to short Blackwater?

You know time are bad when Americans have to go fight their own wars!


CNBC:

...[N]o one really knows how much real inventory is out there in Stockton. [Kevin] Moran [of PMZ Real Estate] has a second line of work where he goes out and assesses the condition of homes for lenders who may want to rework the loans. We followed him to one such home. It was empty. The owners were long gone. "I appraise and inspect over 200 homes a month, and, anecdotally, 30 to 40 percent are vacant and the lender doesn't know it," he says. That means there could be a second wave of foreclosed properties hitting the market in the next five or six months.


NoVawatcher - this was Montclair / Dale City - an area hit tremendously hard by REO's. Honestly though, I believe the problem was worse last spring. I can't tell you the number of auction signs I saw go up every week.
The worst ancedotal story I can share is a house in the general neighborhood that has been empty for at least 3 years (maybe 4). In horrible condition - needs new windows, siding, roof is covered by a large tarp. Looks like the deck is falling apart. Has an above ground pool & I can only imagine what the water must look like after 3+ years of neglect. Never had a RE sign out front & I would guess who ever "owns" this property is just hoping it gets burned to the ground.

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.


There is also the "toxic title" phenomenon. Homeowners are moved out by the lender and believe they have been foreclosed on, only to find out that the lender has never completed the foreclosure process to take back title to the property.

In the low end market, title to the property can require overwhelming costs related to home repair, upkeep, insurance, taxes, tort liability (e.g., for criminal gangs taking up residence), and sometimes the cost of demolition.

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_02/b4066046083770.htm?ch...


This is Real_Folks: Yeah, I live just outside of Quantico and the townhouses have been hit hard. However, I have managed to find someone who is willing to buy my house for what I owe on the mortgage (versus what the county just assessed at) as he was sick of looking at foreclosure after foreclosure and wanted a place that was in decent repair.


The upside of these homes sitting empty. Eventually the local tax authority will foreclose and sell the property to satisfy the tax lien. That is the moment I will buy.

Sweat equity here I come!


Everyone has this backwards.....prices aren't dropping because there are too many empty houses.....there are empty houses because prices are dropping!

Any measurement that shows inventory dropping won't affect prices. Prices are going to where they should be based upon what people can afford to pay. The huge rise in prices didn't come from a squeeze in inventory, it came from easy lending standards and a bubble mentality. Supply rapidly increased as prices rose. If normal supply and demand issues reigned the fierce building over the last several years would have reduced prices, not keep them rising.

If supply gets absorbed at some point, you still won't get people overpaying for a house unless lending standards are eased. It's hard to imagine any easing from this point. I paid $178,000 for my house in 1995 because that is what the bank would lend me on $80,000 AGI. If standards get back to that, I don't care how tight supply is, a buyers is not going to be able to overpay for a house.


I don't know if the SF Chronicle's web version shows the historical foreclosure chart that goes with the printed version, but it's pretty convincing to me that the SF Bay area shadow inventory exists as advertised.

Different issue, but Bay Area related...

Neighbor (Oakland) just sold home after being on market for 9 weeks. Initial asking price - $969k... Sold at $826k. Zillow had it at $1.2M two years ago. Part of reduction had to do with some earthquaking reinforcement that is perceived as necessary, but probably no more than $50k worth.


I've discovered that prices shown in zillow and realtor.com aren't always what they're cracked up to be. I saw a few homes that looked ridiculously cheap and called the listing agent. It turns out that the homes were to be auctioned off and the price listed was the starting price.

I live in a Maryland suburb of Washington DC and the housing market here is different than anywhere else. What's happening is home that are at the higher end, say $600k and up and having very large price reductions while the less expensive homes aren't. I think I've figured out why.

By far the biggest employer around here is the federal government. Most either work directly for the government or work for a company that provides a service to the government. Consequently, the unemployment rate is very low. Montgomery County has an unemployment rate of about 5%. I suspect there are two unemployment rates. One for former private sector workers, which is probably high, and the other for former government workers, which is probably very low.

Working for the government is good for job security, but it's bad for top level pay. Almost all government workers earn between $50k-$150k. There are probably 5 workers earning under 100k for every worker earning over 100k. A typical household of government workers (Mon and Dad both working) probably earns about $150k. Not enough to buy a house over $600k, but enough to afford a house in the $400k-$500k range. So what you have is decent demand for a $400-500k house, but very little demand for a $700k+ house. I've seen many houses with a peak Zillow price of around a million going for around 700k, but homes with a peak zillow price of say $500k are only being marked down to 450k. If you're looking at a $500k house, if you can pony up an extra $150k, you can get twice as nice of a home.


Anon:"Banks don't want to realize so many losses at a time. "

Problem is, there is a steady loss over time even if you don't account for the dropping values of the physical homes due to deterioration and stripping. It's called PROPERTY TAXES. The banks are liable for property taxes for the entire time they own the house post-foreclosure until they are able to unload it. 600k homes is several billion $ a year in property tax liability.


Apparently, there is now a new thread: http://www.hoocoodanode.org/node/6542


There is a three to four month lag from when most banks formal close on a resident to when it shows up on the MLS. I know of two foreclosures in a friends condo building that was foreclosed on in January and have not being listed, and a third that will likely be in foreclosure. Btw, the kicker; he thinks its a good time for me to buy into his building. And, here I am thinking we were friends.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WT7X5C3UXPo&feature=related

Happy Passover to anyone celebrating.


If the primary source for a newspaper article is RealtyTrash then the article isn't worth the cost of the ink.


Faked homes and fraud borrowing?


Last week's New Yorker had an interesting article about Leo Nordine,
a REO broker in LA county.

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/04/06/090406fa_fact_friend

The article is a bit tedious, but it gives some feel about how the REO's
go back to the market.


In OC, I'm seeing homes that have waaaaaaay past their auction dates, sit empty. The owners stop making payments, go through the foreclosure process, move out and yet tax records still show them as legal owners (6+ months later).


I work for the County of Ventura and talk to the foreclosure people that come to the Recorder's office to glean information from our county documents. These folks indicate that there is a second wave of foreclosures taking place and that many are not showing up in the MLS.
I know from personal experience that some of the Bank Owned properties I've been following don't show up on the MLS and are currently being lived in.


We've been trying to buy a house for 3.5 months. Have made 5 offers.
On one of the houses, our first contact with the bank (short sale) was when after a month and only a month to go till closing, they said they needed another month. But they had not yet accepted our offer. Told them to stuff it; house is back on the market.
Our last house, currently has an offer(ours) pending and was for sale for $127k and needed a new septic. We offered $120k and needed a loan of $16k for the septic and appliances (none there) and a FHA 203k loan. They countered with $127k, DUH!!. We countered with $135k and they could install the septic because our ratios would not let us go higherfor a 203k. They countered with $116k, cash only. We countered with $117 and the $16k for the 203k loan. Still waiting to hear.
Are they using new math??


Shadow inventory is bunk. Of course there are vacant homes in the foreclosure pipeline. Inventory in the MLS is down 45% YOY in the Northern Virginia area. The best priced homes are starting to draw bidding wars and escalation clauses, something that hasn't been seen in years. I think that is a sure sign of a bottom in prices for the area although I believe the national stats will lag the DC area. DC is somewhat insulated from the recession.


I live in Sacramento. In the nicer inner areas there are lots of empty houses, weeds growing, some with emergency call #s but most not. I walk daily and many of the houses sit empty without sales signs for months. I also have called the agents for several empty but for sale houses only to be told the house is "on hold." Again, months of sitting without any movement. Sellers in these areas are still asking for bubble era prices. The bottom end of the market seems to be near bottom but the upper 2/3 are stagnant.


The bank has to take title (foreclose, for those of you in Rio Linda) before they can sell the property. Ther servicer can get the bank to pre-approve a short sale price, and line up a buyer, but its all for nuaght if the owner truly abandoned the property and cannot be found to grant a deed to the next buyer. Maybe the buyer is not truly 'in the wind', and can be located to go along with the deal.

In any case, if title goes back to the bank, even for a minute, it might as well be a decade from an accounting standpoint. Also, taking the hit on a short sale is no different than taking the hit as an REO from an accounting perspective, except that in reality they're likely to make out muich better as a short sale than as an REO.


Done